Enter Google and its Nexus line of flagship phones. Though the handsets aren't guaranteed game changers or commercial successes, they're the first to natively deliver the most recent Android operating system. The popularity and instant recognition they drum up from Android enthusiasts are invaluable. So when I heard LG was tapped to build this year's Nexus, I was excited but wary. So how did LG do? The Nexus 4's lack of 4G LTE has many U.S. customers (including me) griping hard, especially now since the technology has been so widespread since its launch, and with a phone of this high caliber.
But it does have a quad-core Snapdragon S4 processor from Qualcomm, a decent 8-megapixel camera, and runs Android 4.2 smoothly, Plus, it's extremely affordable -- unlocked it starts at $299 and only goes for $349 for the 16GB version, While I personally believe that this lyrical lemonade iphone case iteration of the phone does little to progress the Nexus brand as a whole, it can be promising for LG, It should use this opportunity, while it still has it, as a jumping board to roll out handsets that are on par, if not better, than the Nexus 4 and Optimus G..
So whether views about the Nexus 4 are positive or negative, it's nice to keep in mind that, hey, everyone's buzzing about an LG phone. And if nothing valuable comes from this when the next Nexus comes out, at least we could all say, "The Nexus, the Nexus..Didn't LG make that last year?"Whatever your feelings about the Nexus 4 itself, one thing's for certain: getting the Nexus was definitely a boon for LG. Well, the verdict's in on Google's flagship phone, the LG Nexus 4, and aside from the significant misstep of not having 4G LTE capabilities for its U.S. market, the device is great. It runs on Android Jelly Be-- oh hell. Can we just talk about LG for a second?.
As the days go on since reviewing the iPad Mini, I look back and forth between both the "large iPad" and the Mini, I carry both around (I don't normally travel with two iPads -- they're review samples, I own a third-gen), I use them around my home and outside, They're awfully similar in experience, different in size and speed, But I think there's something else going on, I think lyrical lemonade iphone case iPads, to some degree, are entering a transition, The iPad Mini = the evolution of the iPad as we know itThe 9.7-inch "large iPad" has looked pretty similar over its first four generations, Even from iPad to iPad 2, the biggest design leap, things looked pretty much the same, The iPad Mini is the single biggest design shift: thinned bezels, a more iPhone/iPod-like design, and a far more portable feel..
If the Mini is the shrunken iPad 2, then next year's Mini could be the new iPad 3, or 4. Next year, I expect it will get a few extra features (Retina Display) and will become a truly perfect device for e-reading, media viewing, gaming, and apps. It's the most affordable and the most portable iPad, thus it'll be the one many people will flock to. So, where does that leave the larger iPad?. Large iPad: Vanguard of new tech, MacBook Air apparentI currently recommend the fourth-gen iPad over the Mini as the best-in-class iPad for its performance and its wonderful display, but the gap between it and the Mini is smaller than you'd think. The iPod and iPod Mini had a difference, and it was storage capacity. Currently, the large and small iPads are different mainly in processor and screen quality. Those are important aspects, but ones that not every user will care about or appreciate (in the laptop landscape, it's like the difference between ultrabooks and Netbooks).